Minister Schippers dwingt e-health af

Minister Schippers dwingt e-health af

15 juni 2011

In antwoord op Kamervragen gaat minister Schippers zegt Schippers dat ze minder zittingen wil vergoeden om te bevorderen dat behandelaren meer gebruik gaan maken van e-health.

Minister Schippers van Volksgezondheid zal waarschijnlijk meer dan 300 miljoen euro op de geestelijke gezondheidszorg en verslavingszorg moeten bezuinigen. Patiënten kunnen daarom forse eigen bijdragen en minder vergoedingen tegemoet zien.  

Het aantal te vergoeden zittingen bij de eerstelijnspsycholoog gaat terug van acht naar vijf. De eigen bijdrage per zitting zou van tien euro nu stijgen naar dertig euro, aldus Psy. 

E-health
Schippers wil voorkomen dat patiënten te makkelijk doorverwezen worden naar de tweedelijns ggz: “Ik ben mij bewust dat de bijdrage van de patiënt in de eerstelijn lager moet zijn dan de bijdrage aan zorg in de gespecialiseerde tweedelijn,” aldus Schippers.

Kamervragen

In antwoord op Kamervragen van de SP, ging Schippers niet in op de hoogte van de eigen bijdrage. Wel zei Schippers dat ze minder zittingen wil vergoeden zodat behandelaren meer gebruik gaan maken van e-health.

Bron: Psy.nl

Reacties (1)

woensdag 15 juni 2011 12:17
truus straatman

de crisic in dit land wordt afgerekent op de kwetsbare mens wie heeft dit alles veroorzaakt kan er n iet wat minder geld naar griekenland

Reageren

Minister Schippers dwingt e-health af

Minister Schippers dwingt e-health af

15 juni 2011

In antwoord op Kamervragen gaat minister Schippers zegt Schippers dat ze minder zittingen wil vergoeden om te bevorderen dat behandelaren meer gebruik gaan maken van e-health.

Minister Schippers van Volksgezondheid zal waarschijnlijk meer dan 300 miljoen euro op de geestelijke gezondheidszorg en verslavingszorg moeten bezuinigen. Pati??nten??kunnen daarom forse eigen bijdragen en minder vergoedingen tegemoet zien. ??

Het aantal te vergoeden zittingen bij de eerstelijnspsycholoog gaat terug van acht naar vijf. De eigen bijdrage per zitting zou van tien euro nu stijgen naar dertig euro, aldus Psy.??

E-health
Schippers wil voorkomen dat pati??nten te makkelijk doorverwezen worden naar de tweedelijns ggz: “Ik ben mij bewust dat de bijdrage van de pati??nt in de eerstelijn lager moet zijn dan de bijdrage aan zorg in de gespecialiseerde tweedelijn,” aldus Schippers.

Kamervragen

In antwoord op Kamervragen van de SP, ging Schippers niet in op de hoogte van de eigen bijdrage. Wel zei Schippers dat ze minder zittingen wil vergoeden??zodat behandelaren meer gebruik gaan maken van e-health.

Bron: Psy.nl

Reacties (1)

woensdag 15 juni 2011 12:17

truus straatman

de crisic in dit land wordt afgerekent op de kwetsbare mens wie heeft dit alles veroorzaakt kan er n iet wat minder geld naar griekenland

Reageren

Synchronicity, intimacy and productivity

A shortcut to customer and co-worker intimacy is to respond in real time. A phone call is more human than an email, a personal meeting has more impact than a letter.

On the other hand, when you do your work on someone else's schedule, your productivity plummets, because you are responding to the urgent, not the important, and your rhythm is shot.

The shortcut analysis, it seems to me, is to sort by how important it is that your interactions be intimate. If it's not vitally important that you increase the energy and realism of the relationship, then insert a buffer. Build blocks of time to do serious work, work that's not interrupted by people who need to hear from you in real time, right now.

On the other hand, for interactions when only a hug or a smile will do, allocate the time and the schedule to be present.

Confusing the two is getting easier than ever, and it's killing your ability to do great work.

I can’t help but feel that Seth has his finger SO on the pulse of today’s society.

Lessons We’re Learning Riding Mass Transit | zen habits

Lessons We’re Learning Riding Mass Transit

Post written by Leo Babauta.

For almost a year now, my wife Eva, my six kids and I have been walking and riding mass transit almost exclusively.

We have bikes but we’re still new to them, and we also use City Carshare for longer trips out of the city. But for everything else, it’s walking and mass transit — for meeting with people, going to restaurants and movies and museums and parks, for grocery shopping (we only buy what we can carry), farmer’s markets, fairs, visiting relatives, and more.

It’s been one of the best things ever for us.

We’ve adjusted from being car users when we were on Guam. I love walking tremendously (I can walk anywhere in the city), but I also love the mass transit … for the lessons it has taught my family.

Some of the lessons we’ve learned so far:

1. How to wait. Mass transit isn’t always on time (surprise!). But rather than look at that as a reason why riding buses and trains suck, we learn how to see that as an opportunity. My boys climb trees while I do pullups and (admittedly rudimentary) gymnastics from a low branch. We tell jokes and I swing the little kids around. We share things with each other, make each other laugh. It’s a good time.

2. How to walk. Mass transit doesn’t take you everywhere, so we walk more than most families. That’s a great thing. Even my little ones are in pretty good shape and rarely complain about walking. We deal with the weather, which is something most people don’t do, as they’re cut off from the world in their glass and metal boxes. Truthfully, we don’t always walk — we love to race each other up hills and be out of breath. It’s wonderful.

3. How to deal with humanity. We’re often shoulder-to-shoulder with strangers, which is something you never experience with a car. We deal with smells, with annoying people, with those who talk loudly, with the mentally challenged, with plain crazy people. In other words, with people. And this is a great thing. We learn that we come in all shapes and sizes, that life isn’t the perfect picket fences you see on TV, that the world is real … and that that’s OK. We’re learning to celebrate differences.

4. How to live sustainably. We haven’t cut our emissions to zero, but by the simple act of giving up a car, we’ve cut our use of resources and our emissions down more than most people will by recycling, buying less, using less heat, using less paper, etc. I’m not saying this to brag, or to judge others. I’m saying we’re learning, and while we have a lot to learn, I think we’re making progress.

5. That transit can be more convenient than cars. Sure, it’s nice to be able to hop in your car and go somewhere quickly, no matter the weather. That’s convenient. But there are inconveniences with cars that we forget about: the frustrations of parking (especially in San Francisco), traffic jams, rude drivers, car accidents, flat tires, car maintenance, having to stop for gas, having to actually drive instead of relaxing on the trip, sitting all the time instead of moving around, and more. Again, I’m not judging cars, but all of that, if you think about it, makes riding on a bus or train actually seem nice.

6. How to live frugally. My kids aren’t poor, but I want to teach them that there are good ways of living that don’t have to cost a lot. That spending money for conveniences isn’t necessarily a good thing. We shop at Goodwill, ride transit, cook in big batches, eat little meat (my wife and I eat none). We’re not the most thrifty ever, but we’re teaching the kids that it’s possible. (Read more.)

7. How to live with less control. When you have a car, you feel that things are under your control (forgetting about traffic, accidents and the like). But when you’re riding mass transit, things are not under your control. You’re at the mercy of the schedule, of drivers, of other people slowing the system down, of trains breaking down and backing the system up, and so on. You learn to let go of the illusion of control, and to deal with changes as they come. This is a miraculous lesson.

My thoughts exactly.

ICD-10 switch could cost hospitals up to $20M #yam

Transitioning over to ICD-10 could cost large hospitals between $2-5 million and up to $20 million for large systems, according to James Swanson, director of client services at Virtusa, an IT services and consulting company, in a ComputerWorld article.

Regulated by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), healthcare providers and insurance payers are required to change from the ICD-9 to ICD-10 coding system by Oct. 1, 2013. ICD-10, aimed at tracking diagnoses and treatments, affects 15,000 existing codes and adds 68,000 new ones.

Even though the deadline is two years away, massive implementation has been reportedly slow and cumbersome for hospitals and health systems. ICD-10 affects institution-wide systems, including electronic health records, billing, reporting, and decision-making.

Smaller hospitals, in particular, are at risk for not meeting the deadline, according to Jim Whicker, principal technology consultant for health IT strategy and policy at Kaiser Permanente’s information technology division, notes ComputerWorld. Whicker urged CMS to provide more guidance on implementation of ICD-10.

For more:
– read the ComputerWorld article
– check out the World Health Organization’s ICD-10 information

Related Articles:
ICD-10 not a given despite potential for meaningful use delay
Don’t delay converting to ICD-10